The witness of Scripture regarding the suitability of women for public ministry leadership is a mixed bag. Though there are interesting role models in the Old Testament (Deborah and Esther come to mind), this discussion will focus on New Testament data. We shall go back to the OT when necessary, to track down a reference or rationale given in the NT. We can organize our data into a grid (this would be a good white-board exercise, if you undertake a group study). The columns would be “pro” and “con,” and the rows would be labeled “Jesus and the gospels,” “Early church history (Acts),” “Paul’s Teaching and Practice,” and “Other NT witnesses.” My completed matrix appears here:
Pro |
Con |
|
Jesus and the gospels |
Mary and Elizabeth as first witnesses—Magnificat (Luke 1:39–55) Mary and Martha and commendable roles (Luke 10:38-42) The Woman at the well, and her witness in town (John 4:7-39) “The women” as first resurrection witnesses (all four gospels) |
The Twelve were all men (Matt 10:2f)[1]
|
Early church history (Acts) |
Pentecost recipients, 120 men and women (Acts 1:13–15, 2:1-4) Quotation of Joel that men and women shall prophesy (Acts 2:17–21) Priscilla and Aquila teach Apollos (Acts 18:1–26) Phoebe, a deacon and sponsor (Rom 16:1) |
The itinerant apostles were mostly men (Paul, Silas, Timothy, Barnabas, John Mark)[2] |
Paul’s Teaching and Practice |
Appointed Priscilla, Phoebe, Mary, Junia, et al. (Romans 16 greeting) Spiritual gifts never described as gender-related but “just as the Spirit chooses” (1 Cor 12:6–11) Mutual accountability “when you prophesy” (1 Cor 11:5) |
Women should be silent in the churches (1 Cor 14:33–36) Let a woman learn . . ..I permit no woman to teach (1 Tim 2:8–15)
|
[1] The Catholic position is argued pro and con in the Research Report: Women in Church and Society (New York: Catholic Theological Society of America, 1978). The most difficult claim: “The ordained priest must act in the name of Christ, and, therefore, must be able to represent him physically as well as spiritually. The Orthodox refer to this as ‘iconic’ representation.” [Richard P. McBrien, Catholicism (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1981), 853.]
[2] For a helpful discussion on this topic, see Craig S. Keener, Paul, Women & Wives: Marriage and Women’s Ministry in the Letters of Paul (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1992), 246–9 with notes 257.
I wonder if Philippians 4:2,3 might not be useful in arguing that Paul did not carte blanche deny women roles in leadership. If Eurodia and Syntche’s dispute was serious enough to cause Paul to tell the two to settle their dispute in a public letter, it would seem to me that they are in a leadership position. Paul also commends the two for the work they did along side of him.
This is not a perfect example, but I think along with what was laid out in Mary’s chart it adds to the case.
Hi Mary,
It is amazing that with so many positive and supportive biblical indications of women fully participating in the life and leadership of the church, that it took so many centuries for the Church to come around to recognizing it. The Presbyterian Church of Brazil still won’t ordain women elders. And the Roman Catholic Church still will not ordain women priests. (Even though that have plenty closet gay priests).
Go figure.
My favorite passage about the role of the women in the early church is this little comment Luke sneaks in, in Luke 8: 1-3:
“The twelve were with Him, and also some women … and Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod’s steward, and Susanna, and many others who were contributing to their support out of their private means”.
Wait. What?
???!!
Jodie
Thanks, Mary!
In addition to your Bible references above, Phillip had four daughters who were prophetesses. Prophecy is a gift to be desired, especially. How could a prophetess practice her gifts without speaking???
And don’t forget Lydia, the seller of purple in Acts. She as head of her household and it is implied strongly that she becomes the first leader of her congregation.
While there are not many examples of women in leadership in the church, there are enough. I’ve been amazed by the women arguing for the lack of ordination standards telling me over an over again if we just used scripture “I couldn’t be ordained.” Did they sleep through their seminary classes?
Bob:
I don’t think they slept through classes. They probably decided to focus on eisegesis instead of exegesis. After all, eisegesis is an easier class to pass and you do not have to deal with “the problems”.
I don’t think I give a good answer when some ask me how we can ordain women when we find clear instructions that an elder / deacon are to be the husband of one wife. How do you, or others reading this thread, answer such a question?